Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20190306143154 - Catedral Metropolitana de São Paulo.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Webysther 20190306143154 - Catedral Metropolitana de São Paulo.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2020 at 10:09:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info Yes, I know the crop is a little bit tight at the top, but I still think this deserves the star. The elevated perspective makes it more interesting than the usual ground-level view of this cathedral and adds up to a more dramatic photo - I don't think it can be said that this is short on wow-factor. Plus it's really nice to have a high-quality photo of a non-European religious building. created by Webysther - uploaded by Webysther - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 10:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 10:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Comment It's a bit tight top and bottom. Landscape doesn't seem the right choice here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:06, 14 October 2020 (UTC)- Support Very nice. It's a drone pic from a low altitude; I guess more distance would be difficult due to obstacles (trees?). --A.Savin 14:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- +1. I noted the tightness of composition that Charles points out, but it seems (looking on the internet) that there is nothing better, so I suspect there are obstacles in the way. I think it's the kind of thing where you are always going to have to make compromises to get everything in the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Sky noisy and there are a lot of red "dead pixels" in the sky --Llez (talk) 15:09, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- I will try to fix this later. Webysther has not been active since August 2019, so I don't think we are likely to get it fixed by him soon. Cmao20 (talk) 16:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support just clean those "reds". I like pano more than portrait here - do drones have portrait mode anyway ? --Mile (talk) 16:56, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Llez, Mile, the red pixels in the sky should be gone now. Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good composition and nice view. I wish there were less noise and more sharpness. --XRay talk 10:47, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I'm torn. I really like the photo, but I don't like the top or bottom crops. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Top and bottom crop are indeed unlucky, but I like the contrast between architecture styles and the light. --Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support And it's a drone picture --Wilfredor (talk) 18:56, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Meiræ 23:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:49, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Brazil
