Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wasserturm Luzern LCD.jpg

File:Wasserturm Luzern LCD.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jan 2011 at 20:04:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Wasserturm Luzern LCD.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wasserturm Luzern LCD.jpg

•  Info created by Murdockcrc - uploaded by Murdockcrc - nominated by Murdockcrc -- Murdockcrc (talk) 20:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Info View of Wasserturm and Kapellbrücke, both iconic symbols of the city of Lucerne, Switzerland. Mount Rigi can be seen in the background.
•  Support -- Murdockcrc (talk) 20:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 00:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
  • I change my vote to  Oppose Unsharp.--Snaevar (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The light is not very interesting and the composition is not spectacular. There is much better on Category:Kapellbrücke. FP wants the best Commons can offer. This is good but not "the best". W.S. 08:06, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
  •  Comment Hi. I just wanted to point out to the fact that this is a FP nomination and not Value Image. The purpose is not to compare images of the same subject, but to decide if the picture meet the FP guidelines. --Murdockcrc (talk) 08:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Wetenschatje--shizhao (talk) 13:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted. ---donald- (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose: Great technically (and in my opinion a Quality Image), but not outstanding enough to be a Featured Picture. TFCforever (talk) 04:58, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose the composition is very good, but the image is unsharp, tilted and I'm not sure about the lighting (per above) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:33, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose - No specialities for a featured pic......Captain......Tälk tö me.. 06:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral -- IdLoveOne (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)