Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild BW 2011-06-10 11-24-41.JPG

File:Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild BW 2011-06-10 11-24-41.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2011 at 08:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild BW 2011-06-10 11-24-41.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Villa Ephrussi de Rothschild BW 2011-06-10 11-24-41.JPG

•  Info all by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 08:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 08:41, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The water mirror is not centered, neither is symmetrical, this means this is just a snapshot instead of a well thought and planned and composed photograph. This picture as it is is not remarkable, thus I vote not to feature it. (Gussisaurio (talk) 18:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC))

You was there and know that it's possible to get a centered composition from this distance? --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Support--Miguel Bugallo 02:01, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support —stay (sic)! 09:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Gussisaurio --Georgez (talk) 11:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support A little bit soft, but otherwise very good. The discussion about the (not) centered composition is rather funny, because centered compositions are mostly declined here as being "boring" and "uninspired"... -- MJJR (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:37, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 10:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Myrabella (talk) 12:31, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose To me, such pictures need symmetry (regardless of the conditions) - Benh (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Symmetry is the main feature of the object, so it should be photographed accordingly. I understand it might not be possible here, but still it is a shortcoming that prevents it from being good enogh for FP. -- H005 21:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose As per Benh and H005. Saffron Blaze (talk) 10:52, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Enough for featured. --Ritchyblack (talk) 04:48, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per H005. --99of9 (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:19, 22 July 2011 (UTC)