Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Otrobanda, Willemstad, Curaçao - February 2020.jpg

File:View of Otrobanda, Willemstad, Curaçao - February 2020.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2020 at 07:59:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:View of Otrobanda, Willemstad, Curaçao - February 2020.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Otrobanda, Willemstad, Curaçao - February 2020.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Curaçao
•  Info Early morning view of the district of Otrobanda, Willemstad, Curaçao, from Queen Emma Bridge, a pontoon bridge across St. Anna Bay. It connects the Punda and Otrobanda quarters of the island's capital. The bridge is hinged and opens regularly to enable the passage of oceangoing vessels - which takes only a few moments. All by me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support - All the arcs of the bridge are kind of mesmerizing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose The houses framed by the arches fit well together. I find the many boards and the walkers unfavorable.--Ermell (talk) 09:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment The boards are a feature, not a bug, imo, but that's a matter of taste. On the issue of the pedestrians crossing the bridge, well, I'd argue that they illustrate what it is actually built for without obstructing the view too much. I'm almost tempted to state that the bridge is basically empty, at least by its usual standards... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

• That's quite a nice picture, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not enough details--shizhao (talk) 12:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

• excuse me?! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:56, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support per Ikan. IMHO this is just the right count of walkers, without any of them the picture could be somewhat lifeless. --Aristeas (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Nice shot. nice lines for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Processing is a little rough on some of the background trees, but that's not too much of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose I see what you were looking for and I like the pattern of the arches, but the dark floor feels too dominant and not helping overall in the composition, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 19:05, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 09:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Curaçao