Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View from Balcón de Europa in Nerja 2014.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:View from Balcón de Europa in Nerja 2014.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2014 at 13:31:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2014 (UTC)- Support ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 13:35, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Certainly. Yann (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Who is the girl? --The Photographer (talk) 17:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- The Photographer, I don't know who she is but from a photographic viewpoint it was very friendly that she was just walking over the beach when I was talking the photo :) --Tuxyso (talk) 06:58, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --P e z i (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Oppose
Done IMHO overexposure was marginal (technically not obvious in histogram) but I made some careful corrections. King of Hearts, please take another look. Is it better now? --Tuxyso (talk) 06:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the detail is still not there. Maybe the white is now 253 rather than 255, but when it's uniformly 253, that doesn't help. (A simple trick I use to look for washed-out areas is to tilt my laptop LCD backwards. Everything should go dark except for the brightest areas, which are still bright.) But reassessing the image, it seems the problem is not as big as I thought, so I'll move to
Neutral. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, the detail is still not there. Maybe the white is now 253 rather than 255, but when it's uniformly 253, that doesn't help. (A simple trick I use to look for washed-out areas is to tilt my laptop LCD backwards. Everything should go dark except for the brightest areas, which are still bright.) But reassessing the image, it seems the problem is not as big as I thought, so I'll move to
Comment Are my eyes fooling me or is there a lot of clarity and contrast added here? I love the scene and composition but it all seems a bit harsh to me. --DXR (talk) 07:55, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- DXR, the new version should have less clarity than the previous one. Probably you've taken a look on the old one. Nonetheless a bit (local) clarity enhancement helps to bring out the structure of the waves and the foggy mountains in the background. I have not added additional contrast (in the new version). --Tuxyso (talk) 08:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right. The new version is nicer, still a bit harsh, but certainly good enough to Support. --DXR (talk) 08:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, you're right. The new version is nicer, still a bit harsh, but certainly good enough to
- DXR, the new version should have less clarity than the previous one. Probably you've taken a look on the old one. Nonetheless a bit (local) clarity enhancement helps to bring out the structure of the waves and the foggy mountains in the background. I have not added additional contrast (in the new version). --Tuxyso (talk) 08:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 08:37, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 08:43, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ximonic (talk) 05:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 07:06, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
