Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Various grains.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Various grains.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Oct 2015 at 10:29:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info created by Peggy Greb, USDA ARS - uploaded by Thuresson - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 10:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Kasir (talk) 10:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Comment Random composition IMO. The crops are not good.--Jebulon (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Composition and blown highlights. --Cayambe (talk) 12:40, 19 October 2015 (UTC)- Oppose Per Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 16:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose good composition and i see no blown out highlights but unsharp bread in background. --Ralf Roleček 16:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ralf. --Tremonist (talk) 12:47, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Because of too many opposers with various rationals now, without any other support than the one of the nominator.--Jebulon (talk) 16:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Question Is it ok? I think FPX is also a vote so this FPX is double vote or not? --Laitche (talk) 02:33, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Two completely different things. This is not a vote, but a finding. Additionaly, nobody can strike my oppose vote except me, but everybody can strike the FPX with a support vote.--Jebulon (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: But now, we have double votes. Please fix this. Yann (talk) 12:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Done--Jebulon (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: But now, we have double votes. Please fix this. Yann (talk) 12:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Two completely different things. This is not a vote, but a finding. Additionaly, nobody can strike my oppose vote except me, but everybody can strike the FPX with a support vote.--Jebulon (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Very weak support a bit lack of sharpness and cut off the subject is no good but good proportion. --Laitche (talk) 09:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
