Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valley of Tasman River NZ 12.jpg

File:Valley of Tasman River NZ 12.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2018 at 05:16:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Valley of Tasman River NZ 12.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Valley of Tasman River NZ 12.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#New Zealand
•  Info created by Krzysztof Golik - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - This isn't an absolutely humongous panorama like some we've seen here, but it still feels like a pretty big one, and I think what makes the picture work is that the pretty bushes in the foreground give the viewer something interesting to look at aside from the mountains in the background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice, but could have been much better. More sky, less grass/bushes, e.g. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:07, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, sharp foreground but the essence of this theoretical great landscape gets lost in the haze. Might have worked under better lighting. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral Beautiful mountain landscape for me. If the lower grass pollen are cut it will probably be in favor.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

• I don't know what you mean about pollen cut. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:24, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

• Answer: sorry wrong translated. Must bottom are cut. see note.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

• I see. I hadn't thought of that crop, but I do think it improves the composition. User:Tournasol7, if you like the idea, you have my blessing to do that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

• For me, this picture has an encyclopaedic value. Plants of the genus Aciphylla are part of this landscape and I wouldn't like to cut them off... Tournasol7 (talk) 14:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

• I agree with that point. cart makes a good point, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

•  Support Not much not to like for me. Foreground connects the viewer to the landscape nicely. Daniel Case (talk) 02:23, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 09:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment For me the spikey plants is what makes this photo. Without them this would be just another generic pretty mountain landscape. If anything, there is not enough of the plats included in the photo. --cart-Talk 15:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Neptuul (talk) 20:49, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural