Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Utricularia calycifida - front.jpg

File:Utricularia calycifida - front.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2009 at 01:23:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Utricularia calycifida - front.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Utricularia calycifida - front.jpg

•  Info created by Petr Dlouhý - uploaded by Petr Dlouhý - nominated by Petr Dlouhý -- Petr Dlouhý (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Flower of carnivorous Utricularia calycifida (en) from front.
•  Info Size of the flower is about 0.5cm (macro)
•  Support -- Petr Dlouhý (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Hot pixels on the background. Distracting flare on the bottom right corner. Could be sharper. --MattiPaavola (talk) 12:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Flare and hot pixels can be edited, but did you take into account size of the flower, when talking about sharpness?
•  Oppose Noisy. —kallerna™ 15:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose both versions. The shoots behind the flower are out of focus. Snowmanradio (talk) 22:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

edit

•  Neutral Thanks for removing the hot pixels. I would still prefer deeper DOF (which in this difficult tiny case might need special macro equipment, unfortunately). Therefore, neutral. --MattiPaavola (talk) 13:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

  You could use focus stacking without any special equipment (well except a fixed camera position). /Daniel78 (talk) 12:54, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

  I know, but I didn't learn it yet (but I am planning it). I didn't notice, that use of stacking is standard for FP macros (in fact I didn't see any such image, when quickly paging trhough FP). Anyway, thanks for your comments, I will try to do my macros better.--212.24.152.56 06:34, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikiwaner (talk) 10:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)