Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Urmas Lattikas 2011.jpg

File:Urmas Lattikas 2011.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2017 at 08:51:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Urmas Lattikas 2011.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Urmas Lattikas 2011.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Arno Mikkor - uploaded by Kruusamägi - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Right two thirds is over exposed. Lack of detail on the piano top and front of shirt. Piano keys not sharp. PumpkinSky talk 10:29, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per PumpkinSky. Daphne Lantier 19:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per PumpskinSky, great look from subject and pose done in by right two-thirds of image. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral This is a portrait focusing on the face, everything else is just background and unimportant. The short DoF is intentional, I don't think a professional photographer like Arno Mikkor would just accidentally chose that aperture. The white on white objects are a more interesting way to frame the subject (also giving us a hint of what he does) instead of just having a white background, so it doesn't bother me that they are very bright. Looking at the histogram, very little of the photo is actually blown, white well-kept pianos are very white. If only the face had been better lit, I would have supported this. --cart-Talk 08:16, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I can't agree the comments made by the PumpkinSky the slightest. Piano isn't over-exposed and this is a image of a composer and a pianist (and not an image of a piano - that is just a background). Image has to show us the face of that man and so it does. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:21, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment Even if we all agree to your point, the right side of the face is over exposed; which is the main subject. The two sides of his face being so differently exposed is highly distracting to me. PumpkinSky talk 11:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
    • In my opinion the face is also ok. I never nominated this image myself as I don't personally consider it to be that outstanding, but anyway... it was the comment that got me writing. Face could be more evenly lit indeed, but that isn't overexposed. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:03, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 08:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)