Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tronco de árbol fosilizado, parque nacional del Bosque Petrificado, Arizona, Estados Unidos, 2021-01-05, DD 081-103 FS.jpg

File:Tronco de árbol fosilizado, parque nacional del Bosque Petrificado, Arizona, Estados Unidos, 2021-01-05, DD 081-103 FS.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jan 2021 at 15:20:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tronco de árbol fosilizado, parque nacional del Bosque Petrificado, Arizona, Estados Unidos, 2021-01-05, DD 081-103 FS.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tronco de árbol fosilizado, parque nacional del Bosque Petrificado, Arizona, Estados Unidos, 2021-01-05, DD 081-103 FS.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones_and_fossils#Others
•  Info Petrified tree fossil, Petrified Forest National Park, State of Arizona, USA. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Quite strong halo-effect, could be fixed. The canvas texture could be also cloned out. —kallerna (talk) 21:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

• kallerna: I've reduced the halo effect and also reduced the texture of the surface a bit --Poco a poco (talk) 09:46, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Seems sharp and beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Alt

Featured picture candidates/File:Tronco de árbol fosilizado, parque nacional del Bosque Petrificado, Arizona, Estados Unidos, 2021-01-05, DD 081-103 FS.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tronco de árbol fosilizado, parque nacional del Bosque Petrificado, Arizona, Estados Unidos, 2021-01-05, DD 081-103 FS.jpg

•  Info I offer here an alt version with a pure white background. Pinging @Cmao20 and Kallerna: Poco a poco (talk) 16:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --StellarHalo (talk) 16:59, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support This one is better.--Ermell (talk) 17:52, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Pierre André ^(talk) 23:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support It does look better. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad lighting and crude cut-out on white. An FP-level "on white" photo should achieve that with careful product placement and lighting, not with the crop tool in Photoshop. This subject needs raking light to bring out the texture and form. It appears have have been light evenly from front and side and there is glare on the shiny cut surface, which significantly reduces contrast. -- Colin (talk) 16:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 17:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones_and_fossils#Others

The chosen alternative is: File:Tronco de árbol fosilizado, Arizona, Estados Unidos, 2021-01-05, DD 081-103 FS-Alt.jpg