Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tree Canyonlands National Park.jpg

File:Tree Canyonlands National Park.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 11 Mar 2009 at 02:14:23

•  Info created & uploaded by Flicka - nominated by -- Richard Bartz (talk) 02:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma)
•  Support -- Richard Bartz (talk) 02:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose to much light, not sharp in detail, GEO missing.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 08:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question good job. Are we able to take a sharpe picture in detail?--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 22:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Should we add bit color to the photo? I think it needs it. —kallerna™ 14:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question I like it (but with more saturated colors like in the edited version below), but there's a weird thing at the fringe of the leaves of the whole tree where there is like a gray fog at the transition sky/leaves. This can also be seen in several places where there are holes in the leaves and where in some places the background is blue and other gray (and it's not the trunk). Any idea about that ? Sting (talk) 15:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Ask Flicka --Richard Bartz (talk) 16:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose, blue sky appears to be artificial, and it's not very sharp. --Aqwis (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think it's not very important and the photo it's not well balanced. -Theklan (talk) 01:15, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Picture is sharp enough. The colors are not missing or pale, but pictures in deserts like this one are naturally not such colorful as other ones - I suggest you should see some movie where such deserts are seen as well as normal countryside. And the composition looks also nice. --Aktron (talk) 15:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Interesting. Looks nice. --Lošmi (talk) 02:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Basik07 (talk) 12:03, 10 March 2009 (UTC) natural bonzai.

result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Karel (talk) 14:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)