Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Times Square Time-Lapse Style.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Times Square Time-Lapse Style.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2014 at 00:24:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Dan DeChiaro - uploaded by Mono - nominated by Mono -- —Mono (how to reply) 00:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Support -- —Mono (how to reply) 00:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)- Support Ordinarily I dislike these artsier-type effects pictures for their tendency to sacrifice encyclopedic value regardless of their quality. But this is an exception that sort of proves the rule: how else do you capture the very Blade Runner-esque qualities of contemporary Times Square, its bustle and color, without them? It conveys the reality of the place more effectively, I think, than even a video would. Daniel Case (talk) 03:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 08:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Question Isn't this a DW of the Inception poster? Is this covered by FOP? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Oppose Not my taste, and not perfect technically. In this case, I don't know where is the border between "artistic choice" and "strong technical flaws". + we have some FoP issues here, IMO (but I'm not a specialist of US copyright laws).--Jebulon (talk) 15:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)- Oppose No wow and bad time lapse resulting in all the motion blur. --Graphium 15:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per other opposes.- -Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Dislike the processing and not convinced by the framing either. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 18:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 06:11, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition is not that great IMO and the colours are a bit oversaturated. I don't mind the ghost. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:40, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
