Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Forth Rail Bridge, September 2012.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:The Forth Rail Bridge, September 2012.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2013 at 15:59:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by George Gastin - uploaded by George Gastin - nominated by Capmo -- Capmo (talk) 15:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice composition (bridge + reflex), great colours. -- Capmo (talk) 15:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Beautiful but too soft and noisy, a pity. --A.Savin 16:28, 17 January 2013 (UTC)- Support Tomer T (talk) 16:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support There are image quality issues certainly, but sometimes the "wow" factor is enough for me to overlook them as long as the quality's not horrendously bad. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Lovely pic. The sharpness is satisfactory - when downsampled 50% & sharpened, it is still 2.6 MP and crisp.
I'd prefer a 2:1 aspect ratio, even though that loses the foreground detail at the bottom.-- Colin (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, I now see better the diagonal line leading towards the bottom right. So the aspect is fine. Colin (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Still, it's a nice photo... :) Kruusamägi (talk) 21:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Composition and color is impressive enough to overlook zoom flaws. Mono 02:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 20:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! Michael Barera (talk) 01:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, but full ack. A.Savin. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per Savin, technical issues --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:08, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose per previous. It is art, and the color range is pushed to far IMO. FP should be avoiding denaturing reality IMO again, being more ojective than subjective.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 10:11, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- weak support Wonderful light, color and compostion, despite some problems with quality --Ximeg (talk) 10:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per above. --Ivar (talk) 12:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others.--Jebulon (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Comment As an option - a little noise cleaned and sharpen file (updated). --Aleks G (talk) 23:02, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:35, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
