Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tehran in a clean day.jpg

File:Tehran in a clean day.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2019 at 14:50:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tehran in a clean day.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tehran in a clean day.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info created by Amirpashaei - uploaded by Amirpashaei - nominated by Amirpashaei -- Amirpashaei (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Amirpashaei (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment Not sure about this one. There are a number of areas that look quite blurry/out of focus; perhaps you have used a flawed frame when stitching? See image notes. Cmao20 (talk) 15:15, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
  • I made some parts of picture blurry because I thought those part can break the law of copy right of architecture or Violate of Privacy of houses . this work was necessary?--Amirpashaei (talk) 15:24, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure that lack of FoP is a consideration when you've photographed hundreds of buildings in a single shot; that's more of a collage. As for privacy, I understand the consideration, but I don't see any real issues there. Daniel Case (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

• @Daniel Case: , @Cmao20: , I replaced the original file without blurry. thanks for your attentions. --Amirpashaei (talk) 16:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Much better. Cmao20 (talk) 17:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak support I still see some blur up front (which may be more a result of those houses being closest to the camera), and some CA. But ... not so much as to seriously detract from the rest of the image. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment This picture faces North of Tehran, which is the upper-class part of this mega city. --Gnosis (talk) 19:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
  • Yes, you're right. --Amirpashaei (talk) 06:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment some strange circles visible in the sky (all across). perhaps a dust spot that appears in every frame? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  05:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
  • You're right. I fixed circle spots. thanks. --Amirpashaei (talk) 06:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
    •  Support — Rhododendrites ^talk |  18:20, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 07:38, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 17:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose - Certainly a very valuable image, but I don't really love the light and the foreground is very dark. It's definitely a nice view toward the mountains, and I don't want to seem to be undervaluing the achievement, but I feel like we've featured better urban panoramas in better light that are sharper. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:31, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
  • You can see details in dark areas and that's not very dark. Just for cloudy air some areas are dark and some area are bright. That's gave the picture deepness and good form. If you think this is unnatural I can change it and bright the dark areas.--Amirpashaei (talk) 10:58, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I don't think it's unnatural; I just think the light wasn't so good for the picture, and that you might want to try again in different light. And there are areas where I can't see details. My screen is bright, rather than dark, for the record. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

• except some trees, where you cant see details?--Amirpashaei (talk) 06:27, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

• In very dark shadows that just look black. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:55, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:57, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 03:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes