Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teatro Municipal de São Paulo 8.jpg

File:Teatro Municipal de São Paulo 8.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Sep 2014 at 20:51:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Teatro Municipal de São Paulo 8.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teatro Municipal de São Paulo 8.jpg

3509

6585

553

361

11224

7210

to clone out --A.Savin 21:35, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

6994

24

4134

1778

11224

7210

several dust spots and retouching stripes --A.Savin 21:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

2572

1009

1106

1442

11224

7210

(sharpening?) haloes --A.Savin 21:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

10599

3725

601

697

11224

7210

blending error Diliff (talk) 00:35, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Info All by myself -- Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 20:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. Excellent subject and capture! Although it may have been slightly nicer if it were taken with slightly less ambient light. Diliff (talk) 20:58, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jiel (talk) 21:45, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ArionEstar (talk) 21:54, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Question I saw a guy in the picture bottom. He was sleeping. In the left, a police looked at him. These details should take out. Alphama (talk) 00:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

 Done @A.Savin: removed haloes in statues and a bit more of sharpening only in statues. Fixed several dust spots and retouching stripes. @Diliff: fixed blending error. Please, let me know if it is ok. On the other hand, I do not consider removing the beggar is a good practice, in this case, I wanted a real picture, that is what is there every day. If this is for a Wikipedia article, I would not change the reality and that's my main goal, I wait for several days that everyone get the hell out of the front, however, that beggar lives there. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 09:29, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Support All in all it is worthy the FP star. --A.Savin 10:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I think you have overdone the sharpening / halo-removal on the statues. I looked at earlier version and they were fine: now they look like they have been cut out with scissors. The earlier version had really insignificant halo (though the harp has some moire that could be removed with the brush). Please try not to to be tempted to pixel-perfect an 80MP image. I think we are all guilty at times of looking for flaws rather than just leaving it be. -- Colin (talk) 12:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

@Colin: Nice review. I could will fix it the weekend, you are welcome if you want revert or improve the image, this image is your like mine. --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment The stairs in the front: The left third is brighter, and the right two thirds are darker. -- -donald- (talk) 13:21, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

I noticed this problem, however, I believe that is due to a shadow of the building front. Thanks --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 13:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

•  Support -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:15, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good work! --mathias K 19:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. Might be better if it were a bit deeper into the blue hour. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:31, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 12:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Cathy Richards (talk) 20:08, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--DXR (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture