Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sympetrum flaveolum in Nepal.jpg

File:Sympetrum flaveolum in Nepal.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2021 at 07:08:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sympetrum flaveolum in Nepal.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sympetrum flaveolum in Nepal.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)
•  Info created by Mildeep - uploaded by Mildeep - nominated by Biplab Anand -- Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Biplab Anand (Talk) 07:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I love the picture, but this is not Sympetrum flaveolum. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:01, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Charlesjsharp- is it Pantala flavescens?--Biplab Anand (Talk) 05:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Looks more like Crocothemis erythraea Biplab Anand. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose great at thumbnail, but imo oversharpened at full resolution, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 09:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Gallery link refined ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 11:06, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Ivar. Sharpness and contrast overdone. --Kreuzschnabel 11:17, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent image with lots of wow. I don't see a problem with sharpness and contrast. --GRDN711 (talk) 11:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Overprocessed per Kreuz and Ivar. Noisy as well. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm quite impressed with this, except that the unsharp area is disconcerting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. But really a shame, because this image seems to possess the potential to become FP, with a softer processing. Any chance to improve the post-treatment? -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:33, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Mildeep ji, can you fix the above mentioned problems? Thanks--Biplab Anand (Talk) 05:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

 Done corrected, Thank you for nomination. --Mildeep (talk) 04:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good concept but over sharpened. --Muhammad (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 05:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Ivar, Kreuz, Basile Morin and Muhammad, the author have fixed the problem. please take a look now--Biplab Anand (Talk) 06:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

• Thanks for the notification. For a reason I can't explain, the new version doesn't display on my screen. Not a "refresh" problem, something else. Thus I can't evaluate the current candidate, sorry. Will try again later -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Really striking and high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose oversharpening is gone, but some areas are out of focus. --Ivar (talk) 08:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support There are some areas that are not as sharp as the rest (top right wing tip, middle of the abdomen), but so what? I don't find that disturbing unless I pixel-peep, and the wow factor and pleasing colors easily make up for that. Finally a dragonfly picture that manages to stick out among the many, many, excellent FPs we already have. --El Grafo (talk) 07:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 09:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support. I really like this photo, but the unsharp part of the body is disconcerting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per El Grafo. --Aristeas (talk) 11:02, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 02:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:12, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family : Libellulidae (Chasers, Skimmers, Darters and others)