Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

File:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jan 2016 at 10:35:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Peter and St. Paul's Church 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 10:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Diliff (talk) 10:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Yet another great church interior by you. Did you find it more challenging to take this photo because of the whiteness of the room? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:55, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  • It was a bit challenging, mainly because I was trying to keep it looking very white (as it looks in person) rather than a dull grey that most cameras might auto-expose to, but without overexposing the scene and losing the textures. There was also the issue that because of different light sources, some parts of the interior had slight colour casts (both cool and warm) which I tried to compensate for by slightly desaturating the walls (except where there are coloured decorative elements such as the ceiling paintings and the gold gilding obviously). Some might consider that cheating, but as the colour casts were not visible in person because our eyes are quite adept at automatically compensating for colour casts, I think it is a faithful representation. Diliff (talk) 11:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:48, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 19:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support We don´t have churches in Austria which are so illuminated. --Hubertl 22:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Most in the UK are also much darker too, especially the wood, although the ceilings are often white like this. The closest match that I can think of in the UK is this church in London. Diliff (talk) 09:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The Best church Photographer of commons. Excellent quality shoot --The Photographer (talk) 23:32, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Love this church in particular ... it would be fun to have a wedding there because you'd feel like you were having it inside the cake. Daniel Case (talk) 23:45, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 16:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Not my favourite kind of architecture but the photo itself is excellent. --Code (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Baroque is not usually my favourite either, but in this case, I think the stucco work is amazing and the full-white effect is subtle but impressive. Diliff (talk) 07:36, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent composition and probably, the church itself. Quenhitran (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing detail, wonderful lighting Atsme 📞 21:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The best. Extraordinary work on whites. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:55, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 08:09, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 14:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings