Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spitfire Fighter Aircraft 'Hot Starting' Engines MOD 45156196.jpg

File:Spitfire Fighter Aircraft 'Hot Starting' Engines MOD 45156196.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2014 at 17:59:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Spitfire Fighter Aircraft 'Hot Starting' Engines MOD 45156196.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spitfire Fighter Aircraft 'Hot Starting' Engines MOD 45156196.jpg

•  Info created by SAC Graham Taylor - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Chase me ladies -- Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 18:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Why am I having a deja vu moment with this one? Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment Maybe because it was entered to the RAF Picture of the Year 2013 competition and Mr. Taylor won the Photographer of the Year award? It's rather memorable … --El Grafo (talk) 09:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Deja-vue or no deja-vue. It's a great image. Kleuske (talk) 10:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Kadellar (talk) 11:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose First of all, I really like this photo. But I can't, with a good conscience, support it being severely oversharpened and then scaled up by a factor of what looks like something around three. I don't know why that is the case with the photos from this competition (iirc, several of those files were scaled up) but it can't meet FP quality standards that way imo. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 17:55, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose Have to agree with Julian that there's some crude processing gone on with this picture. This seems to happen with competitions where the judges look at small copies on their screen but the winners turn out to be too poor quality to print let alone display in a gallery. The image is heavily posterised like they overworked a JPG. -- Colin (talk) 11:42, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 20:52, 28 June 2014 (UTC)