Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sparkler 3.JPG

File:Sparkler 3.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2009 at 15:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sparkler 3.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sparkler 3.JPG

•  Info created by kallerna - uploaded by kallerna - nominated by kallerna —kallerna™ 15:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —kallerna™ 15:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Hard to believe this is a photograph. -- JovanCormac 16:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Roquai (talk) 20:17, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Weak support. The arcs at the top are cut, which is generally a deadly sin for an FPC, but the image is just too nice to turn it down. Wolf (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Subject cut by crop. --99of9 (talk) 21:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad crop at top. Can be retaken easy. To Kallerna: idea is good, try better realisation -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:51, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per George Chernilevsky + CA. Would be more impressive if some volume was added to the drawn shape by "painting" around objects. (Low quality example of added volume). --S23678 (talk) 01:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose as above --Leafnode✉ 07:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:45, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice, but yes the crop is unfortunate. /Daniel78 (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Crop. Idea is nice, but this is kind of a standard thing to do on New Years Eve where I'm from... --Dschwen (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 02:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)