Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Slayer - tom araya 2 - live 2006.jpg

File:Slayer - tom araya 2 - live 2006.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2009 at 00:29:32

•  Info created by Daigo Oliva - uploaded by JD - nominated by KEN -- KEN (talk) 00:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- KEN (talk) 00:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose Composition, noise, unsharpness, red dot that I don't see on the original photo… I would have liked to know what changes you made on this photo, {{RetouchedPicture}} is intended for this usage. →Diti the penguin — 00:56, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Diti... quality is quite low -- Dcubillas (talk) 04:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose —kallerna™ 12:39, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Considering this is a Black Metal (satanist) artist I think the picture is perfect. It has a Jesus like look, but very dark and aggressive, as the music. BTW, I didn't do anything with the picture, found it here on commons. --KEN (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Black Metal = satanist? Lol. —kallerna™ 13:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Question Why is the photo here is larger than the one of Flickr? And who would add a red dot like that? Either the Flickr user took down the higher res one or this came from somewhere else. Rocket000(talk) 01:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Look carefully, the red light is on the flickr version, just dimmed. I see the flickr version says "Replaced on October 26, 2007" the same day it was apparently "taken" according to that page. So looks as though the flickr user changed his mind and uploaded an edited, down-sampled version a long time after it was already uploaded here (2006). I suppose we must assume our flickr checker did his job properly at the time and all is ok. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose It could be dark and good but to me this does not look like that. Some other metal photos from flickr that I would support: [1] [2] [3] /Daniel78 (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too dark and poor colors. --Korman (talk) 06:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

 result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured (rule of 5 days). --Karel (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)