Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skydiving Parachutisme.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Skydiving Parachutisme.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Sep 2011 at 21:27:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by JEF132 (talk) 21:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- JEF132 (talk) 21:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 17:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I would have supported if the lighting was better and the lens flare was avoided. Otherwise good, even the tilted horizon feels natural for a photographer spinning around mid-air. --99of9 (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Good picture. I oppose because the "vertical" choice is too artificial to my taste, and dangerous for my neck. + the lens flare (minor issue).--Jebulon (talk) 17:51, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- Falling vertically is "artificially"? Did France adopt new laws of physics when it joined the EU? -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 04:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- -1)Yes I'm french, but "France" has nothing to do with this discussion. -2)"France" did not "join" the UE, because "France" was one of the founders of UE. -3)Maybe could we have an interesting discussion about the laws of gravity and vertical falling, but it is not the place here, is it ? -4)I never told about "falling", but about the positions of the bodies, related to the tilt of the horizon. I would have preferred a rotated picture... But i'm sure you were kidding.;)--Jebulon (talk) 10:06, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Falling vertically is "artificially"? Did France adopt new laws of physics when it joined the EU? -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 04:32, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)