Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shivaji Maharaj Raigad.jpg

File:Shivaji Maharaj Raigad.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2012 at 19:50:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Shivaji Maharaj Raigad.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shivaji Maharaj Raigad.jpg

1

4

349

1254

1843

1262

I would like it even more if you crop this part :D Can't you make an Alt version?

353

1165

1157

93

1843

1262

Can´t you digitally paint the base of the statue so it removes those white and red paint (and the rope too if possible)? It's a bit distracting

•  Info Statue of Shivaji Maharaj,founder of the Maratha Empire at Raigad fort,Maharashtra.

created by Cj.samson - uploaded by Cj.samson - nominated by Cj.samson -- Cj.samson (talk) 19:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Support -- Cj.samson (talk) 19:50, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support I really like the perspective, the composition and the detail, there where it matters, Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Аркадий Зарубин (talk) 20:45, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose halo, CA, bad bottom crop. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Would have liked if it was not centered so much, Base seems to be clipped, Framing not that good overall --Dey.sandip (talk) 21:04, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
  • i felt this crop is better and i composed in this fashion because the base structure is not worth coming in the frame. Also, there was some celebrations going on and lot of people from near by village had gathered and sat just below the statue, you can see the fresh garlands and clicking picture in between all these was a challenge, you would know this better :) --Cj.samson (talk) 17:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
    •  Neutral OK, I see the reasoning. Still there are some technical issues, like halos and centered composition that are not exactly flattering, sorry :) --Dey.sandip (talk) 05:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Weak support The bottom crop is unfortunate, but I still like it overall. Michael Barera (talk) 21:37, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. As Micheal --Muhammad (talk) 04:09, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 15:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support After see the base of the statue I totally understand the botton crop (I would do the same). Also please see the notes i left in the image! :) Béria Lima ^msg 15:33, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
• Thanks for the link, linked image clearly shows the base, and regarding annotation, the left crop would make the image too tight and if i digitally paint to remove those marking, then the inscription at bottom will be lost,so left it as it is :)
•  Support --Stas1995 (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Carschten, especially the halo. Looks underexposed to, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but per Carschten. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
•  Support— M♦Zaplotnik ^{my contributions} 15:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Béria Lima ^msg 23:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Sculpture