Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shirvan Domes.jpg

File:Shirvan Domes.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2011 at 12:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Shirvan Domes.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Shirvan Domes.jpg

•  Info created by Walter Callens - uploaded by Azeri - nominated by Azeri -- Azeri (talk) 12:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Azeri (talk) 12:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose it is to grey for a FP image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 14:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Support Azeri. -- Raghith 18:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Not all our FPC images have to be bright, vivid colours. This is better than an oversaturated one. And saturation can easily be increased. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support--Jebulon (talk) 07:31, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Comment it is a little bit tilted.. nobody saw that? it can be easily fixed. Ggia (talk) 16:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

• Its not tilted, its the mountainous landscape of the area. Azeri (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

• look to the building.. not the mountains. Ggia (talk) 10:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Support. It is actually a very nice image, it just needs a little tweaking in Photoshop, to make it absolutely perfect. Grandmaster 17:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support. Classy image --Alakbaroff (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Interesting composition, but quality is soso, even for such a small image. A bit "washed out" and dull. Also looks tilted to the right. - Benh (talk) 19:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose This image needs some post-processing, definitively. It could greatly be improved by adjusting the levels, to start with. There's a lot of range being lost as it is now. --Murdockcrc (talk) 20:28, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above. W.S. 07:19, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose nice composition, but per Benh --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:29, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Alchemist --Llorenzi (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I like it gray -- ☭Acodered (talk) 11:15, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
•  oppose /Ö 19:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Wladyslaw (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)