Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Impala3.jpg

File:Serengeti Impala3.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2010 at 12:25:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Impala3.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Impala3.jpg

•  Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikiwaner (talk) 12:25, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral composition is much better now, but the animal is imo too noisy (ISO 800) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 12:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

  It's a fur with tenthousands of hairs. Any denoising would result in a less sharp image impression at reasonable viewing distance. You don't have to believe me-try it on your computer and you will see it yourself. --Ikiwaner (talk) 15:14, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

  but I don't think that the horns have hairs ;-) And I nill see a denoise image, but maybe you can take a photo with a less ISO item? And: I don't oppose, I just abstain with neutral. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:16, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

•  Support good pose and EV --Muhammad (talk) 16:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Steven Walling 17:24, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 18:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 20:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral I agree with kaʁstn, there is noise, and in the eyes also. --Cephas (talk) 00:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like opposing, but I think acutance is a quality of wildlife photography, an ISO of 800 is just too high. Sorry Ikiwaner. --Cephas (talk) 22:20, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

 Comment Would support if the distracting branch between the horns would be cloned away. --Cayambe ([[User talk:Cayambe|<span class="signature-talkSignature correction --Cayambe (talk) 23:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info How's this? I've cloned out that branch, and applied a slight noise reduction, which has, I think, improved matters especially around the head, when viewed at 100%+. Smalljim (talk) 15:24, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Well done imo. --Cayambe (talk) 23:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Even better. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:07, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 03:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Neutral still too noisy --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:45, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support a little noise, but as this is a "furry" motif it doesn´t really matter imo.--ΠΣΟ˚ (talk) 01:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

The chosen alternative is: File:Serengeti_Impala3.jpg