Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SchafherdeInKoeln.jpg

File:SchafherdeInKoeln.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2010 at 17:25:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:SchafherdeInKoeln.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SchafherdeInKoeln.jpg

•  Info created by Túrelio - uploaded by Túrelio - nominated by Mashaunix -- Mashaunix (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mashaunix (talk) 17:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, it is under 2 MP... :-( --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 17:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support As it says that all rules may be broken, I believe that this is special enough to get my support. Nicolas M. Perrault (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Poor quality, pixelated (look at the shepherd). Was the image upsampled? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:06, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Out of curiosity: what is a herd of sheep doing in a street in Cologne? MartinD (talk) 05:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad quality --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Amusing, unique. I once saw a herd of pigs that escaped on the Champs Elysees. How I wished I had had my camera then! Stellarkid (talk) 15:07, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose of course it's amusing and unique and perhaps not a bad picture. But with that quality and lighting (and some disturbing elements) it should never be a FP--McIntosh Natura (talk) 18:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Should've stayed FPX. Lycaon (talk) 19:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Brackenheim (talk) 20:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment please state reason for opposition as a courtesy to the author/uploader. Lycaon (talk) 13:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Weak support would probably have no problems passing if it were bigger. It's only slightly under 2MP, but it's not as sharp as it could be also. --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose because of the rules. Under 2MP. No strong mitigating reasons IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 22:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- The Thunder Chimp (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose 1,92 MP--Miguel Bugallo 21:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support, Great work, --Hastdutoene (talk) 12:02, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 10:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support This is one of the images I wish I took--Mbz1 (talk) 23:35, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support wow! Really great image. Super composition, so I turn two blind eyes to the quality. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:35, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)