Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sandsculpting, Frankston, Vic jjron, 21.01.2009.jpg
File:Sandsculpting, Frankston, Vic jjron, 21.01.2009.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2009 at 08:07:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Jjron - uploaded by Jjron - nominated by Jacopo Werther Jacopo Werther (talk) 08:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 08:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)- Support Stunning --99of9 (talk) 10:09, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Excellent -- George Chernilevsky talk 11:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Weak oppose Beautiful subject, but crop should be wider and resolution higher. -- JovanCormac 12:00, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Comment-Isnt this a derivative work? Is this pic OK to upload on commons? Cause if it is a have loads of similar pics.--Korall (talk) 18:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- If you think so, of course you can nominate this pic (and others) for deletion. Jacopo Werther (talk) 19:52, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- OR start uploading and see if thay stay? =)--Korall (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- This image was taken in Australia which allows freedom of panorama in its copyright law. Other similar images would depend on the local copyright law in the location where the photograph was taken. Durova (talk) 23:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- It depends on if the sculpture is a permanent installation or not. Im not sure I would see a sculpture made out of sand as a permenent installation, because it will fade in much shorter time than something made from a more time-consistant material.--Korall (talk) 15:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Good point. Perhaps this nomination should be suspended? We actually can't promote if this has licensing issues. Durova (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok! I think is just the time to suspend this nomination and nominate this file for deletion. Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- I thought we all had a big fight over any potential licensing issues at WP:FPC at some point. Noodle snacks (talk) 22:45, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok! I think is just the time to suspend this nomination and nominate this file for deletion. Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Good point. Perhaps this nomination should be suspended? We actually can't promote if this has licensing issues. Durova (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- It depends on if the sculpture is a permanent installation or not. Im not sure I would see a sculpture made out of sand as a permenent installation, because it will fade in much shorter time than something made from a more time-consistant material.--Korall (talk) 15:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- This image was taken in Australia which allows freedom of panorama in its copyright law. Other similar images would depend on the local copyright law in the location where the photograph was taken. Durova (talk) 23:22, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- OR start uploading and see if thay stay? =)--Korall (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
It's interesting to read the previous deletion debate: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Sandsculpting,_Frankston,_Vic_jjron,_21.01.2009.jpg and: en:Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Sandsculpting,_Frankston,_Vic_jjron,_21.01.2009.jpg -- Jacopo Werther (talk) 09:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
How about a sand sculpting exhibition in Portugal where they change the the sculptures once a year? Would those images be OK to upload? Cauase if they are I have some pictures.--Korall (talk) 13:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Jovan, plus, high levels of noise in the sky. --S23678 (talk) 16:35, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful ! I like the "mise-en-abime" effect (sculptors in sculpture). Ceridwen (talk) 18:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- Provisionally withdrawing support per licensing issues above. Durova (talk) 16:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Jovan. —kallerna™ 15:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
