Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Francisco through GGB.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:San Francisco through GGB.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2010 at 16:16:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info San Francisco as seen through the Golden Gate Bridge. You can count the rivets if you want. All by Dschwen (talk)
- Support -- Dschwen (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm surprised as this is not quite your style (this is a positive comment btw) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:34, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support. Interesting idea, very good quality. Jafeluv (talk) 17:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very nice, and I love the different view. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 19:46, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition, impressive view --Cayambe (talk) 20:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Simonizer (talk) 21:25, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support Steven Walling 22:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support But could you take it without the obstructing bridge??? ;o) --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:40, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:58, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I don't like the composition/framing. Limited eductaional value too: the distance between the bridge and city is hard to estimate, the structure of the bridge is unclear. --Elekhh (talk) 03:02, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is not like we have a lack of images that show the bridge as a hole. This is a detail study from a well known vantage point. --Dschwen (talk) 03:31, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Neutral Good idea, but already seen this here... (you too, as you supported) and I prefer the night view. - Benh (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Uhm, Ben... that was three years ago. But as CMehl is one of my favourite photographers on commons I take absolutely no offense in having him credited as an inspiration to me. Let me just add that I think the composition is sufficiently different, and that this idea is a little more obvious than you might think, once you are standing at the Marin Headlands. --Dschwen (talk) 19:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes I now feel a bit sorry to have indirectly accused you of "plagiarism". Please do not take it for you. I just feel a bit sad that chmelh's pic wasn't featured, while yours seems on good path to be so, mainly for the composition reason... despite him having been the first to had the idea (at least on commons, and to my knowledge). But I agree, sometimes, there aren't thousand ways to get the picture... and often, you find out someone else took a similar picture before. I know what I'm talking about ;-) - Benh (talk) 21:14, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Uhm, Ben... that was three years ago. But as CMehl is one of my favourite photographers on commons I take absolutely no offense in having him credited as an inspiration to me. Let me just add that I think the composition is sufficiently different, and that this idea is a little more obvious than you might think, once you are standing at the Marin Headlands. --Dschwen (talk) 19:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --AngMoKio (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Aqwis (talk) 21:54, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Avenue (talk) 13:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support • Richard • [®] • 20:53, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --патриот8790 (talk) 13:45, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support It is a "detail study" indeed. Enzik (talk) 21:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture