Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Samyang 14mm f2.8 lens - Diliff.jpg

File:Samyang 14mm f2.8 lens - Diliff.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2014 at 20:20:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Samyang 14mm f2.8 lens - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Samyang 14mm f2.8 lens - Diliff.jpg

•  Info created by User:Diliff - uploaded by User:Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 20:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
• More info. Focus stacked from 15 images for optimal depth of field. Diliff (talk) 11:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Diliff (talk) 20:20, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral CA on the tips of the flaps inside the lens head. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
  • What do you mean by 'flaps inside the lens head'? If you mean the red and blue band visible on the lens glass itself, this is pretty normal and not a defect of the photo. It is the lens itself causing it (perhaps the coating of the lens, or internal reflections inside the lens), not a defect of the camera taking the photo. I don't think there is any chromatic aberration in the image at all. Diliff (talk) 08:20, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

On those white things on top of the lens. You mean that's actually part of the lens, not something protective? Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

There is nothing white on the lens. That's just the background that's refracted through the lens glass elements. And CA on there is unavoidable, that's just what a lens does if you don't use it in front of the camera but across the front. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 21:00, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Don't see significant CA. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 10:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry but the current view isn't featured for me and the lens is overexposed. I'd prefer more this kind of views: . --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Weak support Not bad. But the background should be 100% white.--Claus (talk) 21:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Pinging Claus for clarification regarding weak oppose support --DXR (talk) 11:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good "exercice de style" (don't know how to say this in English, sorry), but IMO the focus stacking job is not enough for a star, I'm sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 13:21, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Leitoxx ^{Work • Talk • Mail} 17:16, 22 June 2014 (UTC)