Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Peter's Basilica at sunset.jpg

File:Saint Peter's Basilica at sunset.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2015 at 16:10:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Peter's Basilica at sunset.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Peter's Basilica at sunset.jpg

2117

2906

131

131

6859

4925

stitching error?

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
•  I withdraw my nomination All by LivioAndronico talk 16:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico talk 16:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The timing is well chosen, and the exposure is very well done, but the building at right is a no-go. Yann (talk) 16:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

• Ehm....Yann can you explain me better what you want say with "not go"? Merci..--LivioAndronico talk 19:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Impossibilità assolutà?--Jebulon (talk) 20:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

• Sorry, English jargon. See [1]. Yann (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Excellent (to me). The "building at right" is a small pavilion of the famous Bernini colonnade, and part of the whole architectural ensemble. It gives "something" different, and useful for the perspective. Nice.--Jebulon (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

• This is the 50mm Jebulon --LivioAndronico talk 19:56, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Halavar (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Any reason for avoiding a centered composition? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

• Tes King... we are so much used to center compo,thanks --LivioAndronico talk 20:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose I'd rather it be strongly distorted or not at all. The current look, with the building still more or less rectilinear but with the dome off-center, is not appealing for me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:46, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

  Tastes are tastes --LivioAndronico talk 16:20, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Yann... besides, it is unbalanced and I suspect PC. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:46, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Actually non-central compo is very fine here, just that stuff on rigth is bothering. But its too bright, i put the curve little lower and was much better, problem is i get posterization in upper left part, so you must do it from raw probably. So you will get little more contrast and -EV, it was much better for me. --Mile (talk) 07:25, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Done Mile,thanx --LivioAndronico talk 11:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment The non centered comprosition is not really the issue. The foreground structure is not really informative to begin with, but what bothers me is the rectilinear nature of the main buiding, which seems to have been corrected and in that effort loses its natural perspective. The guard rails at the bottom follow a parallel path all along the bottom, indicating perspective correction, because they are not parallel to the bottom of the image area, they should have fallen down as they move to the left. But again in this forum it is more about personality popularity than good photography, at least sometimes... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 23:18, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

• First, the square is concave (I do not know if you've ever been in Rome) and in any case what you call "guard rail" is normal that way. Then if you do not like ... who cares, but do not cry if others like it, is not mature.--LivioAndronico talk 10:58, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

• Hmmm... a concave square? I have to see one of those... Did you correct the perspective? --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Excellent also for me --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:16, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:35, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Something like this yes, its interesting. Not boring composition, it makes you think what is that, since we are so much used to center compo. --Mile (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Eeeeh... why this tight crop on the top? I think the top crop is not related to your tastes ♫•*¨*•.¸¸♪ --Laitche (talk) 15:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Yann here. I believe that it is part of the ensemble but still it doesn't help the composition Poco² 16:08, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great. --Code (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 19:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann and others. --Kadellar (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Yann and others. --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:26, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral You probably tried to avoid the obelisque at the center of the square (I faced the same dilema) but it may be better to leave it IMO. Pretty good otherwise. - Benh (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

• Hi Benh,it was a bit of time since I saw you. Yes I tried,but don't like :p --LivioAndronico talk 15:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Martin ,Colin,The Photographer, Alchemist-hp,Diliff and Daniel can I know your opinion for this too? Thanx --LivioAndronico talk 08:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Neutral Been there, tried a couple of things (e.g. that) and therefore know of the difficulties involved. I can't support your candidate here, but I won't oppose either. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

• Don't worry if you want oppose Martin,is ok . thanks for your opinion --LivioAndronico talk 19:30, 25 June 2015 (UTC)