Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saare mõisa järveallee suvel.jpg

File:Saare mõisa järveallee suvel.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2014 at 16:15:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Saare mõisa järveallee suvel.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saare mõisa järveallee suvel.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Amadvr - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow. --Graphium 05:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overly contrasty. Also colour at end of road looks un-natural. Saffron Blaze (talk) 12:08, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment In the end of the road there is Saarjärve lake -- therefor this blue haze. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• Struck my comment based on your input and Amadvr's below; however, it does look un-natural even if it is :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose burned out foliage -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 17:22, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment I do agree that this picture is contrasty indeed, yet I have to note that summer daylight really creates strong contrasts. Yes, some leaves are burnt out, but their amount is marginal and does not damage the overall feeling and atmosphere here. A that's what matters also, isn't it -- to provide not just a plain document of the place but embed something more, suggest about how this place feels like. I do not agree with "un-natural" end of the tunnel though. What you see there are leaves in the shade, under blue sky. And as the leaves reflect some amount of blue back, this greenery does appear somewhat "bluer". Next time in the nature, please be more alert to the tones and you'll see that the greenery is not always just green, as the snow is almost never just white.. Amadvr (talk) 20:11, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

• I am not convinced by this argument. You may have captured reality in the image and that certainly has its uses, but I look for visually striking images, or beautiful moods captured, etc. This just comes across as harsh and I don't think it actually captures the mood of the dynamic lighting one would normally see in this situation. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Support per Amadvr. --El Grafo (talk) 09:21, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support--ℳ₪Zaplotnik^contribs 12:59, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Indeedous (talk) 16:04, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Jee 04:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)