Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SR 190 Panamint Springs Resort End Death Valley 2013.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:SR 190 Panamint Springs Resort End Death Valley 2013.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2013 at 10:41:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 10:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 10:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Boring scene, light appears slightly harsh, not much "wow" --Dey.sandip (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- You have a strange perception of boredom :) --Tuxyso (talk) 13:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you have a problem with my review, I can refrain from reviewing your images. Let me know. --Dey.sandip (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- No problem with your review. Please keep on reviewing. I answered only because your assessment "boring scene" is far from my personal perception - for me the scene with its interesting hills, dry desert ground, rising warm air from the street surface and the street diagonally wiggling through the photo was the reason for the nomination. Photos are always a very personal matter - I hope you have no problem with my answer. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- The scene appeared boring to me, because it appears like a very flat landscape (with no proper point of attention) under a harsh light, which is giving it a washed out look. Cheers ! --Dey.sandip (talk) 14:13, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- No problem with your review. Please keep on reviewing. I answered only because your assessment "boring scene" is far from my personal perception - for me the scene with its interesting hills, dry desert ground, rising warm air from the street surface and the street diagonally wiggling through the photo was the reason for the nomination. Photos are always a very personal matter - I hope you have no problem with my answer. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- If you have a problem with my review, I can refrain from reviewing your images. Let me know. --Dey.sandip (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- You have a strange perception of boredom :) --Tuxyso (talk) 13:49, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment As much as I dislike strong editing at times, I'd really like to see some more mid-range contrast in this. It does currently look quite flat. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 14:19, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Done Thanks for the hint. I've uploaded a new version. IMHO an improvement. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Yes, better. I like the depth of the landscape. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 15:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 19:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow. --Kikos (talk) 08:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Kikos, can you be more specific please. Especially with negative votes two words are imho not helpful - as I've said for previous votes of you: It should be no big deal with en-3 to write about possible improvements and what elements of the photo lead to your "No Wow"-assessment (light, composition, sharpness, motive,...). It is surely no requirement to do so, but I guess 99% of the photographers appreciate more precise negative comments than writing just "no wow" or nothing (as you've done in the past). --Tuxyso (talk) 08:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, a little bit. "No wow" means that this one for me is average roadside picture without any special content to be featured. Good composition and high quality is not enough to be featured and to place in frontpage. There must be something to catch. Next time, if You see my "No wow" (with my en-3), think about picture, not about me. --Kikos (talk) 14:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Kikos, thanks for your clarifying words. For me a helpful and encouraging review weighs positive and negative aspects up and comes to a final conclusion. We spend a lot of time for good photos on Commons thus we should also spend a bit more time for informative reviews than just write "no Wow" - just my 50 cents. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:49, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, a little bit. "No wow" means that this one for me is average roadside picture without any special content to be featured. Good composition and high quality is not enough to be featured and to place in frontpage. There must be something to catch. Next time, if You see my "No wow" (with my en-3), think about picture, not about me. --Kikos (talk) 14:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Kikos, can you be more specific please. Especially with negative votes two words are imho not helpful - as I've said for previous votes of you: It should be no big deal with en-3 to write about possible improvements and what elements of the photo lead to your "No Wow"-assessment (light, composition, sharpness, motive,...). It is surely no requirement to do so, but I guess 99% of the photographers appreciate more precise negative comments than writing just "no wow" or nothing (as you've done in the past). --Tuxyso (talk) 08:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Christian sent me a version with further improvements (local adjustments on the mountains) and on clarity. Thanks Christian! --Tuxyso (talk) 12:51, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Just for information: a new version, Christian exported the previous one in lower resolution. He has sent me a new version in the original resolution (thanks again!). I look forward to further comments and votes. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:00, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Good composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:24, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:40, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Can't see the Harley (or Corvette), but I have the sound in my ear when looking at the pic :) --P e z i (talk) 10:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support boring, but atmosphere is ok for me! St1995 17:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support not boring for me, I like the calmness that is send out in this image. I only would recommend to darken the image a bit, it seems to be a bit to bright. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:29, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support I follow Wladyslaw's opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 00:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Leitoxx 14:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Jean-Éric Poclain (talk) 11:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 13:38, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:28, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 14:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural
