Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 34.jpg

File:Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 34.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Sep 2017 at 04:38:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 34.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 34.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info Remains of the church of St Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, Spain. The gothic church was built in the 15th century over a former Romanesque church of the 12th century by order of María de Ulloa, mother of Alonso III Fonseca. In 1943 it was declared National Heritage Monument in Spain. All by me, Poco² 04:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 04:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment It's a great composition, but unfortunately the arch nearest to us is not in focus (and a bit overexposed). Charles (talk) 11:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

  Charles: I've reduced the highlights. Regarding the focus, well, probably it was not on the top of the first arch, but I still believe that sharpness is acceptable and at the same time I'm not sure whether that sharpness at that spot is paramount Poco² 11:50, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

• I'm not sure if it is, so I've not opposed the image, and reducing the highlights is good. 16:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC) Charles (talk) 08:19, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Better now with the highlights fixed. --cart-Talk 16:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Really interesting motif and very well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --fedaro (talk) 10:20, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Love those truly flying buttresses! Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Those flying buttresses are very nice. --It's Kong of Lazers 你好 23:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Support But are they flying buttresses? Charles (talk) 11:48, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Neutral Top crop is too tight. HalfGig talk 20:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

  HalfGig:  Not anymore I've also improved the crop on both sides to have the full arches. Poco² 02:12, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

  •  Support Support now. HalfGig talk 13:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is an interesting subject but photographically I don't think this is FP -- the mixed lighting and the messy graveyard base. Btw, Daniel, et al, those aren't buttresses, flying or otherwise. See this photo -- those are the main arches of the church body. -- Colin (talk) 11:33, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

In retrospect, you are correct. Daniel Case (talk) 12:46, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Colin. The idea of taking the pic in golden hour is perhaps right, but it has resulted in uneven lighting. Sorry --Nikhil B (talk) 09:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:14, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings