Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2013 at 09:24:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Weak support This is perhaps our best full-body color shot of the royal bengal tiger. How about cropping out the car full of tourists?Kurzon (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please make sure, that you do not mistake the presence of dust particles as additional noise. The frame and the environment itself were quite full of dust --Dey.sandip (talk) 07:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Though wow is not lacking here (even the car is ok), the quality is very poor (sharpness, noise, blown highlights). B.p.11:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I hate such radical image doctoring. Touching up blemishes is one thing, altering a major aspect of the picture is another. Just crop the picture.Kurzon (talk) 09:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a Canon Wild Click advertisement in India. Good picture in a reasonable resolution (1280x836). A good contribution, even if not an FP. I disagree with any crop suggestion here. JKadavoorJee09:34, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with cropping also. I'm also not supporting the image because it's so noisy. I did this only to prove to myself that I could. The ethics of replacing such a large amount of frame is also probably questionable, even if it's only leaves. Still, here it is. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies10:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not opposed to it in principle if 1) it achieves a good effect; and 2) it represents something which is likely to have occurred naturally. However, in this case there are noticeable artefacts from the cloning (see notes). --King of♥♦♣ ♠ 03:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This edit, essentially destroys the image, a total misrepresentation of reality. I am not even going into the cloning artifacts and other technical things. I understand, if jeep is a major issue for some and hence the original gets oppose votes, but please do not destroy images just for the sake of reinforcing your confidence that you can do edits. --Dey.sandip (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Of course it's a misrepresentation, that was kind of the point. It wasn't even suggested, someone above mentioned a clone job in passing. I only meant this with the best of intentions, more of a simulacrum of a jeepless moment. I never expected it to be supported, and I did not put in any amount of effort into the work that would deserve actual defense on my part (I highlighted the Jeep, used content-aware fill, and cloned out a few of the more blatant areas). It also wasn't my intention to "better" your original photograph in any way. I have no problem deleting the image when this thing runs out. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies07:26, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info created/uploaded/nominated by Dey.sandip -- Dey.sandip (talk) 09:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Abstain As author -- Dey.sandip (talk) 09:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Weak support This is perhaps our best full-body color shot of the royal bengal tiger. How about cropping out the car full of tourists?Kurzon (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry but the vehicle behind the tiger ruins the composition. The image is also quite noisy. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:35, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
.jpg)
