Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rock Creek Park, Washington, D.C., 04259a.jpg

File:Rock Creek Park, Washington, D.C., 04259a.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2015 at 21:51:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rock Creek Park, Washington, D.C., 04259a.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rock Creek Park, Washington, D.C., 04259a.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info created by Carol M. Highsmith, uploaded and nominated by -- Yann (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Some freshness... -- Yann (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Really a nice mood! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 02:04, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Good winter image. A little bit noisy. --XRay ^talk 07:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seems good on first sight, but opened is like bad scan (noise-unsharp). --Mile (talk) 07:40, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Mile. --Laitche (talk) 09:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Looking at it at 6 Mpx (3000 x 2000), it looks quite OK. At least not worse than your own picture with a similar resolution... Yann (talk) 11:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I know you mean this, but 6Mpx for this kind of photos is no wow for me. This one is 18MP plus enough sharp and no noise, even that photo some voters opposed because of no wow... --Laitche (talk) 11:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose No colour space metadata or embedded colour profile in EXIF. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:36, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @Slaunger: Fixed now. Yann (talk) 11:05, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks you, Yann. I checked, and it is indeed fixed now. -- Slaunger (talk) 14:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Pleasant in low resolution, but way too unsharp for a FP. -- Pofka (talk) 19:50, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent composition. Sharpness is fine at 6 MP. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:00, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Visible even from the preview there is a big blur centre-top, a bit too the left. --C messier (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
  • I think this was taken in low light, so slow speed, and a branch moved at that time. Yann (talk) 12:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
  • The blur I describe looks more like it was shot behind a window that had water drops on it. --C messier (talk) 12:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special, no reason for FP nomination. --Karelj (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is beautiful, but suffers from problems at higher resolution. --Tremonist (talk) 13:06, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Yann (talk) 19:34, 8 July 2015 (UTC)