Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Robinhunicke 240x160 August2009.jpg

File:Robinhunicke 240x160 August2009.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 May 2011 at 19:58:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Robinhunicke 240x160 August2009.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Robinhunicke 240x160 August2009.jpg

1604

2086

1057

585

4256

2832

Chin is not in focus. --Slaunger (talk) 22:11, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

•  Info created by Charlie Chu - uploaded by Chrisbelldesign - nominated by Mmxx --   ■ MMXX  ^talk  19:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support   ■ MMXX  ^talk  19:58, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral A pretty good portrait of a notable female game designer/producer. Refreshing topic. I like the expression on her face, which is caught in a good moment. Good light. A tad too soft for my taste, and I think a portrait format may have been more adequate (but I am not sure) — the crop of the hair seems a little awkward. --Slaunger (talk) 21:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support nice bokeh, good dof, composition is okay, expression is outstanding. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 22:08, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pro2 (talk) 22:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support depite of the tight crop. Tomer T (talk) 22:45, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Lošmi (talk) 23:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Maybe a bit too extreme for my taste (the shallow dof and framing) but a very attractive portrait anyway. We need good photos of people as FP. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
  •  Question Sorry, I don't understand why exactly...--Jebulon (talk) 12:18, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
    • Why we need more FP of people? Because there are too few imo. I remember discussing this subject here some time ago and the idea was that the assessments are much harsher on people photos than on the other themes. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:26, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
      • Thanks for answering. Maybe you're right about much harsher assessments, but I'm not convinced by the need of more people pictures...--Jebulon (talk) 14:54, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support, agree with Alvesgaspar. --Avenue (talk) 09:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 14:50, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 19:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Technically impressive, slightly unconventional. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:07, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose bad background because of an akin hair color and it's disturbing in general, very noisy, too short DOF, head poorly cut off at top (--> limited EV), ... I'm surprised about so many supports --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Questionable crop at the top but the resolution and technicality compensates fully for it, IMO.--Snaevar (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I am not sure if this image needs some white balancing or these colors are natural.. but the portrait is nice aesthetically. Ggia (talk) 18:39, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunate crop. W.S. 18:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice face, but crop. Przykuta → [edit] 16:17, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People