Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roasted chickens.jpg

File:Roasted chickens.jpg, Not featured

Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2009 at 00:30:04

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Uhm yeah, meanwhile food photography is very rare but roast chickens with overblown highlights and soberly composition ? Hmm, no. --Richard Bartz (talk) 02:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Well, if it is not to your liking it is ok, but overblown highlights? No my friend, they are called "specular highlights" in photography, caused by the quality of the surfaces that sometimes act as mirrors, such as chrome, water and other shiny surfaces. Furthermore, specular highlights are acceptable in photography. In this particular case they are neither exesive nor intrusive. The visual elements here have to do with color, texture, and yes, the sparkle. But like I said, if you no likey, you no likey. That's ok. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 06:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
    • I stick to my opinion. The highlights are eroded 2 much. --Richard Bartz (talk) 12:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like roasted chicken very much :P The photo is great in my opinion! Tiago Fioreze (talk) 08:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Richard Bartz. Could be quality-image. —kallerna™ 13:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral--Kuvaly (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Estrilda (talk) 13:40, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral It's kind of cramped, I would like it better if it were zoomed out to show more of the mechanics like the wheel on the right. I might change my mind and support it later, it's good image. --IG-64 (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too dark. --Jagro (talk) 20:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose: The subject is kind of interesting, but I think the photograph does not live up to it (composition, oversaturation). Compared to many other FPs, the photographic quality is rather low. --Siebengang (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose While tihs picture does make me hungry, it's also too dark. Sophus Bie ^(talk) 23:22, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As Richard Bartz, mainly composition. --Karel (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 2 neutral =>  Not featured. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 08:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)