Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roadkill on Route 170 Okatie Hwy by the Chechessee River, SC, USA, jjron 09.04.2012.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Roadkill on Route 170 Okatie Hwy by the Chechessee River, SC, USA, jjron 09.04.2012.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2016 at 08:35:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
Info 50px|link=User:ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2/Nomination of featured images on Arabic Wikipedia Project Featured picture on 2 Encyclopedias.created by jjron - uploaded by jjron - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)- Strongly
Oppose - In what possible way is that featurable? A sad or disgusting motif can be featurable, but the composition has to be really special. Can you please explain why you think this is one of the most outstanding photos on the site? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:41, 3 July 2016 (UTC) - Oppose Terrible, for above --LivioAndronico (talk) 10:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan Kekek above. --Cayambe (talk) 11:12, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support I do understand the opposing votes but imo this is a very good illustration of a truly ugly scene --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:56, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. INeverCry 22:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Martin Falbisoner it’s a valuable illustration, however, it’s not outstanding by photographic means. The composition is not balanced. Doesn’t wow me. --Kreuzschnabel 23:00, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I think this is much better than most of the other images in Category:Roadkill, as it includes the road and some vehicles. From the wikipedian POV, this makes it more valuable. From the photographic POV, it's more than just a documentary mugshot-like picture. Hence, I totally agree with the featured status at the 2 Wikipedias. But for Commons FPC, it's not quite WOW-y enough imho (some external examples of what I'd consider good candidates in this "genre": [1], [2]). --El Grafo (talk) 14:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Ikan and EG above. Perhaps a VI in time, but not featurable technically. Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Utterly disgusting. Like it. − Meiræ 08:04, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!)
12:26, 5 July 2016 (UTC) - Support Excellent work. One of our best pictures in its category. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:56, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 04:43, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
