Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rio Marin Venezia.jpg

File:Rio Marin Venezia.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2016 at 10:09:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rio Marin Venezia.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rio Marin Venezia.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 10:09, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Very good photo, pleasant to look at and informative. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:12, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support A nicely understated picture that captures Venice well. I would have sharpened a little less, but that's me. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for the support Daniel. I usually, as in this case, don't sharpen and camera settings are neutral in regard to sharpening. Actually I like this picture for the crisp rendering of lights. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:41, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good image, but nothing special, no reason for FP.--Karelj (talk) 21:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Karelj, I think the lighting conditions could be better. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:57, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I nominated the picture because of the lighting conditions --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too much shadow. --Yann (talk) 10:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Venice is made for lovers. --Hubertl 22:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose this is not special enough for me for such an extraordinary city as Venice --Rftblr (talk) 06:35, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

   Comment - I respect that opinion. It's a very good and informative photo, but I understand the pro and con arguments on whether to feature it or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:25, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special. Sorry --A.Savin 14:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Yann. I like the composition but the lighting is far from good. Maybe this spot could be FP at a differnt time --Poco² 23:40, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The shadows don't bother me at all; they're an important part of the scene. Composition is excellent. -- Thennicke (talk) 01:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:49, 8 March 2016 (UTC)