Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rainbow trout FWS 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Rainbow trout FWS 1.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2011 at 09:03:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Knepp, Timothy - uploaded by Neil916 - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Citron (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)- Support -- Raghith 09:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Ximonic (talk) 13:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 04:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Oppose I would have drawn this picture differently. There is an unnecessary line to the right in the background, the holes in the rocks look unrealistic to me and it looks like the fish has two dorsal fins.--Snaevar (talk) 06:59, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see the unnecessary line. Can you annoted on the painting please.--Citron (talk) 16:30, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Sorry, but no bells ringing. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Neutral The shadow of the rock(s) stretching up under the fish's jaw is a huge error, in my opinion. I would have given this a solid support otherwise, but that area literally draws the eye down and away from the fish. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 13:33, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- I think the ”shadow” between the jaws of the fish is still just part of the mouth which might be visible from this angle, not supposed to be a continuum for the rock shadow. Or, I'm not sure if you just mean that there should be a little extra place for a small shadow of the rocks between the jaws. --Ximonic (talk) 18:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
- No no, it's the dark shadow between the rocks just below its lower jawline is too dark, too distracting. I've lightened it in this reduced-size example: Imageshack. I think that looks far better, and that would get my support vote. It's just a flaw of the artist's, I believe, but nothing that can't be fixed as a derivative work : ) Note: I also changed my vote to neutral, above. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 10:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, I got your point. I think you're right, the lighter background there would highlight the head of the fish a little more. So I would definitely support that alternative too – yet I wont oppose this if is this remains as the only proposal. --Ximonic (talk) 19:38, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- No no, it's the dark shadow between the rocks just below its lower jawline is too dark, too distracting. I've lightened it in this reduced-size example: Imageshack. I think that looks far better, and that would get my support vote. It's just a flaw of the artist's, I believe, but nothing that can't be fixed as a derivative work : ) Note: I also changed my vote to neutral, above. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 10:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
- I think the ”shadow” between the jaws of the fish is still just part of the mouth which might be visible from this angle, not supposed to be a continuum for the rock shadow. Or, I'm not sure if you just mean that there should be a little extra place for a small shadow of the rocks between the jaws. --Ximonic (talk) 18:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
