Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quaternion OpenCL 11111111 32K.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Quaternion OpenCL 11111111 32K.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2019 at 19:06:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
- Info created by PantheraLeo1359531 - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment What's with all that black? The problem with this is that the close-up details are far more beautiful than the whole image and extremely few people can see this image at full size all at once. I don't know what to make of it. --Cart (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose It is a nice inverted rendering of the Mandelbrot set but as Cart says, there is more beauty in close-ups and even if I use the zoom viewer, I can't actually zoom very far. There are lots of ways of rendering the set and hard to prefer one over another, though I do prefer it black in the middle rather than this inverted way. This sort of thing is probably best viewed interactively rather than one person's static visualisation of the whole set.
- As an aside, I wrote a program to draw the set in groovy colours about 35 years ago. To speed things up I calculated the outline of a square and if that was all black, didn't bother with the middle. Then divided the square into four and repeated. Still took hours but I got some lovely pictures, and this was the coolest thing in maths at the time. I bet there are lot more clever ways of doing this faster today with the latest graphics cards. -- Colin (talk) 20:19, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose agree Cart Seven Pandas (talk) 21:07, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Cart--Boothsift 00:14, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cart.--Vulphere 03:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cart, interesting but there are better ways of visualising the Mandelbrot set nowadays. Cmao20 (talk) 06:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Thank you for nominating this image, unfortunately it is going to be very challenging to overcome these five opposes and the reasons brought up by Cart and Colin. --Boothsift 01:59, 14 June 2019 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |