Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo March 2010-2a.jpg

File:Porto Covo March 2010-2a.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2010 at 23:56:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo March 2010-2a.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo March 2010-2a.jpg

•  Info Composition on blues, whites and loneliness. This is the place I'll probably move to when I retire (no, it isn't me yet seated on that bench). Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk)
•  Oppose Sorry, you've nominated pictures like this before. IMO there's still not enough wow, and there's quite many distracting things in this photo. —kallerna™ 12:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Distracting from what? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
    • Elements: garbage bins, tv-antennas etc. —kallerna™ 16:09, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
• Good to know I'm not the only one having a deja-vue. --Dschwen (talk) 14:45, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
  • i had a deja-vue, too ;) here is the old candidate --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:35, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:35, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The guy onthe bench would have been a pretty strong subject with tighter framing. This is neither fish nor fowl. The composition seems unfocussed. Makes me wish to see a more complete view of the square. Plus the dark shadows tilt it to an oppose for me. --Dschwen (talk) 19:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Is a good subject and an FP will be possible I think. This version has a major composition weakness with an uninteresting and dark tree located in the very centre as a dominant element. I think the image would gain from a right crop of ca. 1/4, just right of that little dead tree. Elekhh (talk) 00:42, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nothing special. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The "darks" are very dark and overall the composition just isn't "composed" for me, sorry. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 12:03, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:13, 26 March 2010 (UTC)