Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ponte dos Ingleses, também conhecida como Ponte Metálica.jpg

File:Ponte dos Ingleses, também conhecida como Ponte Metálica.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2016 at 21:12:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ponte dos Ingleses, também conhecida como Ponte Metálica.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ponte dos Ingleses, também conhecida como Ponte Metálica.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
•  Info created and uploaded by Claudney Neves - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Image quality is not the best, but for a 16 MP resolution I'll allow some room for error. Great colors and composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 08:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
•  weak IQ could be much better but per King --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice image. Sharpness could be better. Lens flare should be removed. --XRay ^talk 10:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
•  weak support For King --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 14:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose - This is a very pretty picture, but considering that we're considering whether it's one of the very best on the site, I think it falls a bit short in that I don't find the composition super-compelling and the sky is noisy. I don't love this blurry a background in a seascape, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:12, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Great mood and composition. But even recognizing that it's a long exposure, it still could be sharper. And the motion blur on the ship kind of ruins the effect for me. Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 17:17, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose agree about the motion blur on the ship making this photo be a little below the high standards for FP. --Pine^✉ 06:05, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose I would support it if the noise is reduced, composition works for me, nice scene Poco² 11:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
  • @Poco a poco: Could you do this? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:21, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
    • No, sorry I cannot do it until Tuesday. I'm abroad right now and have no access to LR Poco² 14:17, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 06:36, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges