Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg

File:Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2010 at 20:18:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pfahlbaumuseum Unteruhldingen amk.jpg

1026

86

322

119

3000

1976

Contrail

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by AngMoKio -- AngMoKio (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Stilt houses in Unteruhldingen --AngMoKio (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- AngMoKio (talk) 20:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
• weak  Support. Not the most extraordinary quality, yet an interesting composition and subject. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 20:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bland composition. Steven Walling 19:46, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

• Could you please explain what is wrong with the composition? It seems an application of the classical "en:Rule of thirds". (You divide the "canvas" in nine more or less equal parts, and put the main object on one of the intersections.) MartinD (talk) 09:35, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

•  Support — MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 19:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - tourists. Would support if there was a bunch of re-enactment people dressed in iron age costumes instead ;-) MPF (talk) 17:28, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

  Well this is a quite popular museum at the lake constance which mostly has visitors. So this pic documents the place as it mostly is. --AngMoKio (talk) 20:50, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

  I'd be very surprised if they don't hold re-enactment events from time to time. A photo of one would be much more worthy of featuring, as it would show the place as close to its original state as possible - MPF (talk) 23:09, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

•  Support I like it! Not the easiest shot but well done! Composition is fine and the tourist should to be there if it`s an used museum. OVerall really good, but where is the panning? --mathias K 14:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

hehe...yeah...unfortunatelly those tourists were to slow for a decent panning shot ;-) --AngMoKio (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

•  Support I don't mind the tourists; it's what it is, right? The image should reflect the realism of the place. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 20:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture