Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Papilio maraho male ventral view 20160423.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Papilio maraho male ventral view 20160423.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 May 2016 at 05:43:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info created by Peellden - uploaded by Peellden - cropped and nominated by Pine -- Pine✉ 05:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Pine✉ 05:43, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Oppose - Others will confirm or contradict me, but it's my impression that the standard for featured insect pictures is high, so a picture of a beautiful butterfly probably won't get featured unless most of the butterfly is quite sharp. This one is not that sharp. If this nomination fails, you might want to try a Valued Images nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ikan, looks sharp to me -- I can see scales over the wings and hairs on the body. You aren't going to get all the legs/antennae to be in-focus for a macro shot, and the wings seem to be aligned on the plane-of-focus. I'm more concerned that the body is black and lacking detail, but I'm not viewing with a quality monitor at the moment, so will have to wait to judge that. The wings are an amazing shape and pattern. -- Colin (talk) 07:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- It seems to me, more than half the body is unsharp. I don't find the wings completely sharp; maybe I should make more allowances for that, as they're pretty clear and beautiful and the level of magnification is amazing. But the body bothers me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Ikan, looks sharp to me -- I can see scales over the wings and hairs on the body. You aren't going to get all the legs/antennae to be in-focus for a macro shot, and the wings seem to be aligned on the plane-of-focus. I'm more concerned that the body is black and lacking detail, but I'm not viewing with a quality monitor at the moment, so will have to wait to judge that. The wings are an amazing shape and pattern. -- Colin (talk) 07:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Amazing level of details, and for the sharpness – hey, this is a 15 megapixel image! It may not be crisp sharp but could hardly been taken any sharper than this, more sharpness is possible per downscaling only. The wing is full of detail all over its area. --Kreuzschnabel 11:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Nice DoF, please fix overexposition zones. --The Photographer (talk) 11:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Neutral Great detail but poor lighting, it looks like the shot is against the source of light causing that specially the body is too dark. The bright area in the top is also a minus. Poco2 08:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 19:29, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 21:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support Nice colors. A lot of detail for such a small picture. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
