Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Rothaus-Zäpfle-Turm.jpg

File:Panorama vom Rothaus-Zäpfle-Turm.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2022 at 15:31:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Rothaus-Zäpfle-Turm.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Rothaus-Zäpfle-Turm.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
•  Info Panoramic view (360°) from the Rothaus-Zäpfle-Tower in the near of Höchenschwand, Baden-Württemberg, Germany with view to the Alps during meteorological inversion
•  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive panorama up to the highest technical standards, especially an excellent level of fine details. The sea of clouds in the background adds much to the atmosphere. --Aristeas (talk) 16:44, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not a fan of the long strip format, which IMO lessens the use cases of the full photo. And for browsing, a spherical panorama (edit: with larger vertical FOV) is much better. Interesting example of thermal inversion though. - Benh (talk) 19:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

• just noticed after zooming back that the part of sky under the sun is darker than the rest. I believe it should be the opposite (at least it should be even). - Benh (talk) 19:43, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too long to be useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Impressive to me and serves as a reference. People don't usually read reference books cover to cover; if you think of that analogy, it is relatively much easier to look at this entire panorama. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

To extend the analogy, if this were a book it would be published in more than one volume. One would be too difficult to read. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

In a book it would be a image to be unfold. There are books with such panoramas. Milseburg (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Mainly per my comment on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Winterpanorama von der Milseburg.jpg. And also per Benh and Charles -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment A spherical panorama would be uninteresting here, because then the majority of the image would be dominated by the observation deck and the landscape would be largely obscured by it. The conditions on the Rothaus-Zäpfle-Tower are different than on the aforementioned Milseburg, where you are completely outdoors. The way shown here is the only way to show the complete panorama of the sorounding landscape.--Milseburg (talk) 16:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

  Unless I miss something, there should be a way to make it an interesting spherical panorama judging by how the observation deck is from the photos. You can circle through the deck and remain close to the border. This would involve parallax issue, but nothing that can't be concealed in the vegetation which is very stitching friendly (I've seen much more tricky stitching). And as a benefit everything down to the bottom of the tower would be offered for us to stare at. Benh (talk) 19:15, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

  Believe me, the blue empty sky and the tennis hall, the sports fields, the sauna and the outdoor sauna area around the tower are not as interesting enough that you have to inflate the panorama so that no one can load it anymore. Milseburg (talk) 22:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

•  Weak support 360 panoramas are not very interesting to me either, but I am persuaded by Ikan's reasoning that this is an important document of the view, and there has clearly been a lot of effort to produce it Cmao20 (talk) 11:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk)
•  Support -- Je-str (talk) 11:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sometimes I oppose on the grounds that the image is not enough ... it is like part of a better image. Here the image is too much ... I understand the desire to have a 360º panorama but outside of the sea-of-clouds part it is less interesting. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposers plus the clouds are almost overexposed at some places. -- Ivar (talk) 16:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2022 (UTC)