Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opernpassage Panorama.jpg

File:Opernpassage Panorama.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2016 at 22:16:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Opernpassage Panorama.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Opernpassage Panorama.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info created and uploaded by Thomas Ledl - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:16, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Looks like it could use a slight crop at right to even things out; otherwise very nice. INeverCry 23:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Excellent work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:49, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Nice --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 01:14, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:54, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support So very cool ... Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:12, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose At the edges, unfortunately, the quality is poor - strong posterization. I don't understand how this should be necessary, as this is a panorama and so it is normally no problem to get each of the frames crisp? --A.Savin 15:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Not necessarily true for rectillinear projection. Very wide FOVs have far less quality at the edges because more stretching takes place there. That's why I always downsize to 50MP even though center quality could also do 100 or so. --DXR (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

• {{s}} --Hubertl 18:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
  •  Comment I made a closer look, indeed, there are some severe problems. Not just posterizations, also noise and overexposed areas. But in fact, its really a great composition, worth, to do it again (with all possible problems, it´s extremely crowded there) --Hubertl 18:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Question Why such oversizing ? Cant open it anyway. --Mile (talk) 20:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

• Use the non-flash viewer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:46, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:48, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:05, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:40, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 16:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 13:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 10:35, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 01:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors