Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:OldJewishCemeteryTombstones.jpg

File:OldJewishCemeteryTombstones.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Oct 2009 at 16:31:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:OldJewishCemeteryTombstones.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:OldJewishCemeteryTombstones.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by Aqwis -- Aqwis (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Aqwis (talk) 16:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Im sorry but I do not understand the crop/composition.--Korall (talk) 17:33, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

  Feel free to oppose. ;) I must admit I don't expect this FPC to succeed, but I still nominated it since I like the picture. --Aqwis (talk) 17:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support I really like it too. MadGeographer (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I like the composition too, but it seems to me that those colours are not natural, the manipulation should be documented, and the strong tilt that is visible in the background should be removed. -- H005 20:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

• The colours have not been manipulated - if they are off, it is because the white balance is off. However, I think the white balance is quite accurate: the white wall in the back looks pretty white to me, while it would have been yellowish or bluish if the white balance were off. As for the tilt, I think it creates a more dynamic feel, although I'll upload a straightened version if that's what you prefer. --Aqwis (talk) 21:09, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 20:28, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment This picture is a matter of extreme contrasts: not only between the shades and highlights, but also between the crisp and sharp foreground, and everything else, due to the extremely shallow DOF... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:00, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Really interesting picture, but sharpness problems, tilt and overexposure (bottom right) spoil it. -- JovanCormac 06:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overprocessed. —kallerna™ 15:05, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose As above. --Karel (talk) 14:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like it --Phyrexian (talk) 00:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2009 (UTC)