Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19-22 PAN.JPG

File:Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19-22 PAN.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2016 at 20:59:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19-22 PAN.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19-22 PAN.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info Huacachina oasis, Ica Region, Peru. The location has a population of 115 and is built around a natural lake in the desert and is a popular destination for sandboarding and buggy riding. Note: there is already one FP of this site, but I believe that the composition is different enough to give it a try with this one. All by me, Poco² 20:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 20:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:22, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 22:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Brilliant. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Great photo, but I think there is a small flaw (cloning problem perhaps). It seems two people have been cloned twice. I added an annotation. Any way of rectifying it? Nikhil (talk)
•  Support great but per Nikhil --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Great photo, but there are two stacking errors, see notes (As usual, one overlooks the faults in own pictures but notices them in others on the first sight ;-) ). Should be fixable. --Llez (talk) 11:34, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

  Hi Llez, Daniel: I've uploaded a new version addressing those stitching issues Poco² 18:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

• Hi Poco, the right one is OK (well done!), but there is still the second (the left). It is located where the path, on which walk two people, reaches the upper rim of the dune. Also this two ( or three?) people are a bit strange, in front of the left person is seemingly a "half person". I suggest to remove out these people completely --Llez (talk) 18:21, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

• Ok, Llez Actually I did fix an stitching error in that area in the previous version but not yours :( I got it, please, check this version. Poco² 19:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Yes, you got it --Llez (talk) 20:56, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Mö1997 (Questions ?!?!) 13:57, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral pending resolution of the stacking errors. Daniel Case (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Support--Hubertl 08:50, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment Almost identical is already featured. --Ivar (talk) 09:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

  Ivar: As I stated in the introductory note above not in my eyes, 40 MPx vs 90 MPx, different essential elements in the composition and different crop/ratio. I also believe that picture is more striking that the other one Poco² 16:49, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

 Comment Sorry, I didn't see the note. Imho the first version should be delisted ja replaced. --Ivar (talk) 17:02, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 10:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

The chosen alternative is: File:Oasis de Huacachina, Ica, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 19-22 PAN.JPG

What alternative, George? Only one photo was being considered, and no photo was nominated for replacement, though one person informally suggested it should be replaced. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Indeed, as I started this additional FPC I was never intending to replace the former FP. As I already stated, I consider both different pictures from different points of view Poco² 11:27, 11 July 2016 (UTC)