Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (49666286236).jpg

File:Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (49666286236).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2020 at 21:37:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (49666286236).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (49666286236).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms#Virus
•  Info created by NIAID - uploaded and nominated by Habitator terrae -- Habitator terrae 🌍 21:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality for this small scale, the colorization has much wow. -- Habitator terrae 🌍 21:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is as normal SEM photo, coloured, no details of the virus discernible --Llez (talk) 13:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

  @Llez: Same would apply on the precedence File:Ebola Virus - Electron Micrograph.tiff. In the case viewable here in addition the apoptotic cell is very detailed. Habitator terrae 🌍 14:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support Wow-y image, and pertinent to current events, too! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not very sharp, and quite noisy, for this rather low resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

  No better quality is possible in this scale. Taking a look at other example of such photographs enabling to see, this is one of the best on this scale. Habitator terrae 🌍 23:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

  At least 4x bigger is possible. Plus the novelty is not what we're looking for in FPC. We had similar nominations during the Hong Khong protest, recently. For sure we'll have much more interesting documents about the virus in the future. Also please check your categories, there are currently red links -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

  4x bigger is possible, but this isn't the same quality. The red link was also ununderstandable for me, but now solved. Novelty is no criteria, but this picture has so much wow (in my opinion), that I wasn't patience to wait the respectful time before nominating... Habitator terrae 🌍 11:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

  The picture you link above is just 1.5x bigger. But thanks for uploading 4X bigger images of this virus. As said above, it is possible -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose for now. It's certainly interesting but it's not that high resolution and not superb quality. I think that when the Coronavirus crisis has passed in a few months' time we'll be able to look at it with enough distance and perspective to judge fairly what kind of image might represent it at FP, but right now I think there's a temptation to feature this just because it's an important current event, while the image quality probably isn't up to it. Cmao20 (talk) 21:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment - Or whenever the crisis is over... -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:58, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 11:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
•  Neutral It has wow indeed, but it's noisy as Basile Morin said. --pandakekok9 05:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC)