Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nasi Goreng.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Nasi Goreng.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2010 at 17:31:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Number55 - uploaded by Number55 - nominated by Number55 -- Number55 (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Number55 (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Comment I find the post-processing on the background distracting. Jujutacular T · C 05:42, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Oppose agree with Jujutacular --AngMoKio (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, what do you mean with distracting? I removed the background because i thought the original bg (my kitchen table) could distract..
- If you think that with the original background the image can be better, i have no problem to reupload with that --Number55★ (after 54, before 56) 00:07, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Without seeing the original, I can't say for sure, but I'll say indeed the edit was probably an improvement. To be featured however, I would require a more naturally non-distracting background (without the need for much post-processing), like File:Tomato je.jpg for example. On that one, you don't look at it and think about the post-processing that may have occurred, you just think of tomatoes. Jujutacular T · C 03:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Because in this case, the food is in a highly reflective bowl which shows a reflection of the previous background; the reflection and what it reflects to don't match. The tomatoes are not reflective, so the same problem is not present. - MPF (talk) 07:41, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I understand. Maybe I can remove the reflection from the bowl..--Number55★ (after 54, before 56) 14:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Because in this case, the food is in a highly reflective bowl which shows a reflection of the previous background; the reflection and what it reflects to don't match. The tomatoes are not reflective, so the same problem is not present. - MPF (talk) 07:41, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Without seeing the original, I can't say for sure, but I'll say indeed the edit was probably an improvement. To be featured however, I would require a more naturally non-distracting background (without the need for much post-processing), like File:Tomato je.jpg for example. On that one, you don't look at it and think about the post-processing that may have occurred, you just think of tomatoes. Jujutacular T · C 03:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - ditto to AngMoKio - MPF (talk) 07:41, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose MPF nicely put together my thoughts; it looks almost "unnatural" the way the lighting is. ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 17:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:30, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
